I will be posting a sample chapter from this book shortly as well and then posting revised material for books on Max Fleischer, Tom Tyler and a graphic novel collaboration with an exotic dancer about moments from her life on the road.
Let me know what you think, if you can.
Perhaps the first question any journalist has when they land an interview is “How much time do I have?”
Chances are you will have 10 to 20 minutes to speak with someone well known. That’s not much time and it requires writers not only to prepare to use those few minutes wisely but also to be able to improvise.
Many actors will tell you the secret to a performance is listening and reacting. The same holds true to interviewing.
I would guess that 95 percent of every reporter working right now hasn’t had the opportunity of doing what was long considered the gold standard of interviews: those found in the front of Playboy. Those writers traditionally were given lengthy access to their subjects over a period of several meetings and then carefully edited the interview together in such a way to present a well-rounded look at a person.
Over the years, being profiled in Playboy became prestigious.
In a professional writing career that started in 1975, I’ve had one opportunity to do multiple interviews with someone that lasted more than 15 minutes and that was with William Gaines, the publisher of the much respected EC line of comics in the 1950s and the publisher of MAD magazine.
The opportunities to do intense sit-downs don’t come very often.
Most of the time when a journalist has some time with someone famous there is a purpose attached to that interview and invariably that subject has something to sell. A book, television show, a movie, a new record or a political objective are probably the most common reasons for anyone mildly famous to want to speak with a reporter.
Otherwise, why submit yourself to something you can’t control? Perhaps the only time a celebrity would allow himself or herself to be intensively grilled is if it panders to their ego. If a major magazine, for instance, selects a particular person for a lengthy profile, there is certainly an unmistakable element of ego buffing.
The key to a good interview is to allow the subject to get his or her plug into the story, but to try to find the time to ask something that make your few minutes with this person and your story different.
One of my journalism professors, a former Chicago newspaper reporter, said all of the best interviews he conducted were in bars. Somehow that sounded sort of romantic to me when I attended college in the 1970s. That was hardcore – a reporter in a cheap suit getting some elected official to spill the beans through a liberal application of booze with one eye on his watch and the other on his notebook.
The scene has the ring of being from “The Front Page,” or my favorite newspaper movie “Five Star Final” – catch it the next time it’s on Turner Classic Movies.
I’ve interviewed hundreds of people. Most were not famous. Some – many of which are in this book – were. Only two of those interviews were conducted in a bar – once with a Penthouse magazine centerfold and once with an exotic dancer who was staging a retro burlesque show.
So much for the romance from the era when reporters wore fedoras with a press pass stuck in the band, drank their Scotch neat and called into a newspaper to speak with a re-write man.
The fact is most interviews are done at the convenience and schedule of the subject and the more famous a person is – or the hotter he or she might happen to be at the time – the probability grows that a writer will have to jump through many hoops to get what he or she needs.
If a star has a new movie out and you get on the list to speak with him or her for 10 minutes then you call at the appointed time, ask your questions and say goodbye. You don’t meet her at her hotel room when she is in town or at a high-end restaurant for an extended sit-down, if you are a working class writer such as myself.
Instead you work with a publicist in securing the time and you find out if there are restrictions to what you can ask. Sometimes those restrictions are for legal reasons; sometimes it’s about ego.
If you are working on a story about an outstanding investigation, the district attorney may speak with you but won’t comment – at least on the record – on anything unresolved.
I spent five years as a local radio talk show host and one of my first interviews was with a state senator – later a member of Congress – who told me off the air at the beginning of my program that he wouldn’t talk about some particular issue. I acquiesced to his demand, although I hated doing so.
Why? I wanted to preserve my access to him in the future. This is the game you have to play with news sources, many times elected officials. If you embarrass them, they are not going to speak at all with you in the future.
A reporter has to walk a line between doing the story that needs to be done and understanding reality. Some times idealism wins at this game and some times reality wins.
Interviewing can have its dangers, such as a good-natured throttling from the late wrestling great Killer Kowalski. This shot was taken after I did a quick interview with him at Mountain Park in Holyoke, Mass. in the mid-1980s.
If you decide to bash someone, make sure you don’t wound the person. Instead, kill him, because if they can hurt you in the future, they will.
With people from show business, violating restrictions might mean a publicist won’t cooperate with you in the future or it might result in a celebrity ending the interview much earlier than you hoped. Of course that can also make for a good story.
It’s always wise to negotiate about restrictions, to make sure that perhaps some of that forbidden information can be discussed.
With celebrity interviews, I’ve seldom encountered the problems of someone speaking off the record, as it is usually politicians you want to do that. Essentially, someone speaking off the record wants you to know something, but you cannot attribute any of that material to that person directly. That’s when you see phrases such as “according to a source close to the governor” being used, chances are that source was the governor.
Many of the interviews one sees on television are the end result of both negotiations and pre-interviewing. A producer will go over questions or subjects to make sure everyone is happy with the direction of the interview.
Some of the interviews in this book had some restrictions, but there were no pre-arranged questions and answers.
When I was on talk radio in the 1980s, I jumped at the chance of having Cassandra Peterson on my show. She is better known as Elvira, Mistress of the Dark. The publicist came on the telephone prior to the live interview and told me that I wasn’t interviewing Peterson, but instead Elvira.
The idea of interviewing a character was not what I had in mind. The segment was lame. I stank trying to set up improvised comedy bits.
In 2011, I had the chance to interview Peterson again. This time it went well as I spoke to Peterson and not her alter ego. At the end of the interview I told what had happened years before. Peterson, who was a member of the famed comedy troupe The Groundlings, was a friend of Paul Ruebens also known as Pee-wee Herman.
She said that back in the 1980s she was impressed that Ruebens never broke character even in interviews and she wanted to do that herself. We had a good laugh about it.
Some interviewers believe strongly in doing a minimal amount of research because they believe they are representing an average reader or viewer who is fairly ignorant on the subject. This approach worked well for Larry King, but then he was as famous, if not more, than his subjects. I watched a few interviews conducted by King in which his approach actually wasted time. I wanted him to get on with a meaty question instead of the soft ones he was throwing.
A regular working reporter doesn’t have the luxury of assuming an interview subject will be gracious when asked questions that reveal the reporter’s ignorance.
I believe in doing research because it has been my experience that if you actually prove to a subject you know something about them, they will favorably respond.
Also doing research may change whatever prejudice or perspective you might have about the subject.
An example of this was when I interviewed Clayton Moore, the actor who played the Lone Ranger in the long-running television series. I made a point of not talking about the Lone Ranger until about mid-way through the interview. I spoke with him about his entry into show business and roles he had that didn’t involve wearing a mask.
My reward was Moore saying warmly to me, “You really know something about my career.”
At the end of the interview, he said “Adios amigo!” I teared up. After all this was a childhood hero of mine. Thank goodness, I was on radio.
Being a fan can work in your favor in an interview if you don’t fixate on questions that seem obsessive and if you show that you actually do appreciate the person’s work and you’re not just blowing smoke.
I interviewed actor and director Leonard Nimoy about an exhibit of his photos in a local gallery. I didn’t say a word about “Star Trek,” despite being a fan. It wouldn’t have made sense within the context of the conversation.
If I’m a fan of someone, I will admit it as I’ve learned over the years that it is one way to break the ice and to relieve my own nervousness. When I told Bill Cosby I loved his work for years – my family listened to his comedy albums over and over when I was a kid – he said, “Good. That will make this a lot easier.”
We spoke for 45 minutes and I got a great interview.
Revealing that you actually like someone’s work provides a bit of humanity to a process that can be very repetitive to celebrities. I had the opportunity to speak to actress Maureen O’Hara and told her the truth: I had had a crush on her since I was about 12 and I thought she was a very under-rated actress.
Both are true statements. She looked at me and said she agreed with me – she had been under-rated. The interview went well.
On the other hand, sometimes you meet someone who you admire and find out the worse. I loved the music of Don McLean and when I interviewed him the encounter was so negative it put me off listening to his recordings for years.
People frequently make assumptions when speaking with a reporter that they share knowledge on a subject. For me, interviews are about learning and if I do not understand something, I slow things down and make sure I’m keeping up.
When I’ve not done my homework I’ve paid for it. When first interviewing comic Jim Breuer I was under the impression he was still on “Saturday Night Live.” That was a mistake and Breuer – whom I’ve interviewed three times – let me have it in a good-natured way.
Having a list of questions is also invaluable, although one has to go with the flow of the conversation. I had exactly 10 minutes with rock legend Alice Cooper and every minute had to count. Cooper was courteous, highly professional, sharp and expected me not to waste his time. I didn’t.
How did I get into writing, much less interviewing? When I was a young teen, I became seriously interested in movies – especially horror, science fiction and fantasy – and there was no one at my small town high school who shared my interests.
Listen, getting excited about the new issue of “Famous Monsters of Filmland” was something I learned not to speak about at Granby Junior Senior High School in the somewhat rural town of Granby, Mass. It’s little wonder I didn’t date until I was a senior.
Through “FM,” though, I learned of the world of fanzines – amateur magazines published by geeks like me. Interesting enough, there were no words like “nerd” or “geek” then. We were just fans.
I was thrilled to find fellow fans and decided to publish my own’ zine as a means to communicate, if nothing else. I didn’t want to make money. Luckily for me, my father, who was an industrial arts teacher not only had his own spirit duplicator machine at home – so I had a printing press – but he also taught me how to silk screen.
And so I launched my fanzine “Inertron.” The name came from the substance that enabled comic strip hero Buck Rogers to defy gravity in the 25th Century.
My interests undoubtedly mystified my parents, but my dad kept his remarks to a minimum and my mom helped me by being the typist for the magazine.
My ‘zine never had more than 100 readers, but it was the reason I became a journalist. I was hooked on writing.
I quickly learned that what drew people to fanzines were interviews with the stars and authors of our type of entertainment. And so, I decided to seek out someone who would draw attention to my little ‘sine.
My legs were literally shaking when I called Buster Crabbe in 1972. I sat in the kitchen of our home with a microphone stuck with a suction cup on the receiver asking questions to the first movie star I had the opportunity to interview.
And not just any movie star – it was Flash Gordon.
I had found out that Crabbe lived in Rye, New York, and had written him. He very graciously replied with his telephone number and a time and date to call.
At that time, Crabbe was riding a wave of nostalgia that brought attention again to performers such as Buffalo Bob Smith of “Howdy Doody” fame and Clayton Moore, the Lone Ranger himself.
It was the first time that the childhood heroes of the Baby Boomers saw they had a second or third career as college students rediscovered them.
Clarence Linden “Buster” Crabbe came to prominence in the 1932 Los Angeles Olympics as a gold-medal winning swimmer. His athletic fame was translated into a contract with Paramount Pictures.
Crabbe was a utility player at Paramount. He was handsome and had a great physique, something which was played up in his first starring role as a Tarzan-like hero in “King of the Jungle” in 1933. He was never deemed by Paramount brass, though, as anyone who was “A” film material.
Instead Crabbe found himself as a supporting player or as the lead in program pictures. Perhaps his most prominent role for many people was in the W.C. Fields comedy, “You’re Telling Me.”
His place, though, in cinema history was assured with the success of the three “Flash Gordon” serial in which Crabbe played the comic strip hero. Serials were deemed as entertainment for children and other not so demanding audiences, but the Flash Gordon serials received a prominence that few serials reached.
After his contract with Paramount ran out in 1940, he found a new home at PRC, the lowest of the low budget studios where Crabbe made westerns and jungle adventure films.
In the 1950s, Crabbe made numerous appearances on television and had his own successful series, “Capt. Gallant of the Foreign Legion.”
Acting took a back seat starting in the 1950s, when Crabbe became involved with several profitable businesses – a swimming camp, an affiliation with a pool company and work as a stockbroker.
Crabbe had made his final film, a comedy titled “The Comeback Trail,” in which he played a retired cowboy. He was clearly enthusiastic about the film, which received scant theatrical release and has yet to appear on home video.
Crabbe died in 1983.
One thing I learned at the tender age I conducted this interview is just because a statement about an actor or director is made in a book by a film historian that doesn’t mean it’s true. Crabbe refuted two “facts” that were stated about him.
Also in my ignorance, I sort of had an idea that if you worked in a genre of film – such a serials or low budget Westerns – you knew other people who worked in similar films. That wasn’t necessarily the case.
This interview originally appeared in my fanzine “Inertron” in 1972.
Since you were an Olympic champion I was wondering what your opinions were of this year’s Olympics [1972 in Munich, Germany].
“Well, I think it was very poorly handled, much to be desired management wise. I certainly didn’t agree with taking the Gold Medal away from the youngster Demanche who won the 400 meters, he’s the one who had the asthmatic condition with the pill. I think it’s inexcusable that two boys were sleeping when they were supposed to be up for the preliminaries and that began with, I feel, the coach’s and management’s fault, not the athletes’.
“The basketball was certainly an all fouled-up affair and if I had anything to do with the Montreal Olympics in 1976 I certainly would take a wary eye at what might happen before they spent a lot of money preparing for the 1976 Olympic Games.”
There is a new book out entitled “Heroes, Heavies and Sagebrush” that claims your first movie was “Island of Lost Souls” with Charles Laughton. Is that true?
“No, I was not in that film at all. My first was ‘King of the Jungle,’ a Tarzan-like picture Paramount made and released in 1933. I don’t know where that ‘Island of Lost Souls’ came from."
I was wondering if that had been any rivalry between you and Johnny Weissmuller?
“Sure there was.”
When you were both Tarzan?
“Well, no. I never considered myself a Tarzan. I thought you were talking about the competitive days. You know he’s older than I am and I started off as a kid racing him. After the ’28 [Olympic] games he retired from swimming and started in the movies in 1930.”
Did you make up your own Tarzan yell?
“No. The Tarzan yell, which was learned by a lot of kids – the original Tarzan yell, the one Weissmuller did – was the brainwork of my wife’s father, a fellow named Tom Held, who was a cutter at MGM. They didn’t know what kid of yell they were going to do and believe it or not, it turned out to be not one voice. The original Tarzan yell was three – a baritone, a tenor and a hog caller. Then Weissmuller learned it and every kid in the neighborhood learned the Tarzan call, too. So they used it ever since, but originally it was three voices, three separate voices all melted together.”
I know that you worked with W.C. Fields on a picture.
“Oh yes, I worked on two.”
Do you have any stories of him?
“He was just as he was on the screen. As a matter of fact, this nostalgic thing has been a plus for his films. Box office-wise his films drew, but he wasn’t a big tremendous box office star. I would hazard this: that the Fields pictures are doing better now than when they were first released 30 or 40 years ago.”
Do you ever get tired of being recognized as Flash Gordon?
“Well, no. You know, you didn’t have the coverage in the old days in the middle ‘30s and early ‘40s, you didn’t have the coverage you do now with television. Not that many people recognized me. More people recognize me now even though I’m older, as having played Flash Gordon than in the ‘30s and ‘40s, I think. They run the things on television and let’s say it plays to two million people. A serial that played to two million people might have taken two years to do it.”
You were one of the top Western stars. Who were your favorite cowboy stars?
“Well, Tom Mix. I used to see him as a kid. I thought he was really tops – Col. Tim McCoy, too. I liked [Wild Bill] Elliot very much in fact. You know, nothing fancy in dress and what not."
I was just reading Jim Harmon and Don Glut’s new book, “the Great Serial Heroes,” that you were offered the role of Superman first in the serial which eventually starred Kirk Alyn. Is this true?
“No, that’s not true.”
I heard that you’ve finished a new movie with Chuck McCann in it.
In this clip from "The Comeback Trail," Crabbe's character is the narrator. The Western footage features Tom Tyler from his first sound serial, "The Phantom of the West."
“Well it’s a thing called 'Comeback Trail,' and the deal is that it is supposed to be previewed now. It was made a year and a half ago, but they have been stalling on the cutting. However, I think that it’s going to be a very funny Western, a semblance to a Western, take it or leave it – it’s in a Western locale.
[Note: 'The Comeback Trail' never received a wide theatrical release and is not readily available on home video.]
"The plot is about a couple of fellows, Chuck McCann and Bob Staats, who are producers of skin flicks, horrible skin flicks and they have to do something to make some money because they owe a lot of money.
"In checking over the bills they owe they come across an item of insurance and Chuck wants to know what this $12,000 worth of insurance is about. Bob explains that when you make a film, you’ve got to insure it in case anything happens, you know, if the negative film is destroyed by fire or some such thing.
"The wheels begin to roll and they decide to make a Western film and instead of taking a young fellow whom they could develop into a Western star, they pick an old fellow for a reason.
"They’re going to make him do all of his own stunts, all his own falls off of horses ad infinitum, hoping to bring on a heart attack and have him drop dead on the set so they can collect the insurance.
"They insure the film for $2 million and go about finding the fellow and it turns out to be me.
"All during the film we go along telling our story, you see it’s a film within a film – you see us actually getting ready to shoot the scenes for the film – it bounces back and they never do succeed in putting me away, so to speak.
"That’s the story. It’s a funny picture, a real funny picture. These fellows are good; they work well together like a Laurel and Hardy team. I think that after the film is shown and I’ve only seen a couple of days work and some cuts – I’ve never seen even a rough cut of it – but watching the fellow work together and whatnot I really think that they have a chance of getting to be a comedy team a la Laurel and Hardy.”
Other than your Flash Gordon role, which role is your favorite?
“Well, I like the 'Captain Gallant of the Foreign Legion' – that was 65 films we made for television in 1954 and ‘56– because my son was in it. I enjoyed making that series. He was with me all the time and that was kind of fun.”
Speaking of that series, some people would condemn it today because its supposed excess of violence would be detrimental to Saturday morning viewers.
“Oh that is so very wrong! Take a look at what they have on the screen now! This is tame compared to what’s going on now! Look at cowboy pictures that they make now. Look at pictures Clint Eastwood and people like that make! Blood and thunder! This, they looked down upon 25 and 30 years ago. No, we don’t even hold a candle to what’s going on, Too much violence? That’s asinine."
Well, it was bothering me because I was raised on your Foreign Legion show and the old Lone Ranger series.
Sure, they were a lot of fun. If they try tried to shoot you and they weren’t successful you shot them, you know, it was one of those things. But violence wise we don’t even compare.”
Which role have you enjoyed most in life: that of an athlete, movie star or a businessman?
"I never really considered myself a movie star. One of the reasons for that is that I never had a top grade triple A script and a top grade triple A director and producer. I never had the chance to work with a real big director in the business. The result is that I made action pictures, which turned out to be fortunate for me. The Billy the Kid Westerns, all the Westerns I did for Paramount, the serials I made and the other action things stood me in good stead because when television came along they sort of resurrected me, so to speak.
"But I always considered myself, when I was a college student and before that, as a fair to middling swimmer and I go for the physical fitness type of thing, That’s why I’m involved in the Masters Swimming program now =, which is for guys and gals who aren’t so young anymore.
I was reading a book by William K. Everson who said that your career, like that of W.C. Fields’s Paramount career, was mismanaged by the studio.
"I think that they could have really done something with it had they put on their thinking caps and brought me along. They took me dripping wet of out of a swimming pool.’
"Now don’t misunderstand me, I had a year in law school and wasn’t a dummy who came out of left field or anything like that. I think with a little bit of grooming and the right kind of coaching then I might have been able to do something, but that’s over the hill now.
"I was there a long time at Paramount and I did what I was told – you know body and soul belonging to Paramount Studios. The type of comedy that Fields did, I don’t think they appreciated. I think that they could have done a better job promoting him – tours and things. Maybe he turned them down, I don’t know, maybe he said the hell with them – “I don’t want to go on the road “ – but I kind of doubt this because he came off vaudeville back east here. I think the man has a point particularly in regard to W.C. Fields."
Well, he mentioned in the book that they gave you a fairly good starting picture, “King of the Jungle.”
“King of the Jungle” was fine, but it was the “Me Tarzan, you Jane” type of thing. The word got out around the studio that regardless of my background – you know, college and a year of law school – that “he looks fine if you’ve got a life guard part, you strip him down and put him in a G-string, he’s okay, don’t give him any dialogue.” This is what I had to live down the first two or three years there."
Would you like to do more films after this last one?
"Oh yeah, sure, I’d like to work in a movie. Of course, I’d have to be a character [actor] now. I love to play heavies. I had more fun playing the heavy than the lead by far. Love to play the real nasty guy."
Thank you Mr. Crabbe for allowing me to ask you these questions.
"No bother at all, Mike."
Interviews for my fanzine that followed included James Pierce, a college football star in the 1920s who played Tarzan in “Tarzan and the Golden Lion,” among other roles, and the publisher of MAD magazine, William Gaines.
I sold a version of the Gaines interview to a local alternative weekly, “The Valley Advocate,” which also bought the first interview I conducted that wasn’t a fanboy subject.
Veteran NBC reporter and commentator Edwin Newman was appearing at the Eastern States Exposition promoting his book “Strictly Speaking: Will America be the Death of English?” in 1975. I had heard about it and managed to arrange to speak to him at the sales table. The book was a New York Times bestseller and Newman, whom I had grown up watching on television, was a gentleman, which undoubtedly soothed my nerves.
The only reason a local or regional publication would have a chance at a celebrity is because he or she is coming to town for a purpose. I learned through my five years on local radio as a talk show host that celebrities viewed the electronic medium differently.
During my tenure, I discovered I didn’t require having a local hook for an actor or writer to be interested in speaking with me. People appearing on television shows were happy to speak to me if their show was in my market. Authors wanted the exposure for their books.
Politicians were, for the most part, overjoyed to get onto radio.
My time on the air was 1982 to1987 at a time when stations still hired local talent and the Fairness Doctrine, which required stations to present both sides of a controversial issue, was still in force. When the Fairness Doctrine was revoked, the rise of syndicated program espousing one political point of view began and stations started getting rid of local hosts, whom they had to pay, and replacing them with syndicated shows that were for free. All the local stations were given time in those shows to sell ads.
Local hosts were supposed to be jacks-of-all-trades, talking about many subjects. Their shows would change from hour to hour, depending upon the guests
.
A show also reflected the interests of a host and as soon as I realized that station management didn’t care what I did, I decided to care just about my interests and those of my audience.
If there was someone of note coming into the area, I tried to book him or her to appear either by phone or in person. When I look over the list of people I was able to interview on a 500-watt daytime AM station, I feel a little pride.
The first “celeb” was a personal favorite of mine, music historian Dr. Demento. Soon after, a science fiction convention in town gave me the chance of having actors Barry Morse and Sarah Douglas in the studio. Douglas was dressed in a black leather outfit that closely resembled her costume on the Christopher Reeve “Superman” films. I was a little intimidated, but she and Morse were wonderful.
It’s one thing for a journalist to sputter and pause while he or she is asking questions for a newspaper story, but an interview that is broadcast live is quite another matter. You really don’t want to sound like an idiot and stumble around. On the other hand, you don’t want to ask questions that all sound pre-scripted. The best way was to simply try to have a conversation with the subject.
If you’re subject is in the studio, you had to balance between speaking with the guest, running the controls and watching the clock. Keeping your finger on the seven-second-delay button was also a good idea if your guest was accepting calls from your listeners.
A partial list of people, some of whom are in this book, would include two Playboy playmates – Terry Nihen and Debbie Johnson – actors such as James B. Sikking, Lucie Arnez, Richard Crenna, Keye Luke, William Benedict, Virginia Christine, Rick Moranis, Dave Thomas Antonio Fargas, Mark Metcalf; authors Gerri Hirshey, Sidney Sheldon and Cleveland Amory; directors George Romero and Larry Cohen, abortion rights pioneer Bill Baird; Myra Lewis, the former wife of seminal rocker Jerry Lee Lewis; former Attorney General Eliot Richardson, Sen. George McGovern, Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis, Rev. Ivan Stang of the Church of the Sub-Genius, Mel Taylor of the legendary instrumental guitar group the Ventures, folk artists Tom Rush and Aztec Two-Step, Larry “Bozo the Clown” Harmon, Phil Proctor and Peter Bergman of Firesign Theater, Jack Benny co-star Dennis Day, comedians Lois Bromfield, Emo Philips, Yacov Smirnoff , “Weird” Al Yankovic and cartoonist B. Kliban.
Two memorable interviews were with Clarence Nash, the voice of Donald Duck and Andriana Caselotti, the voice of Snow White.
I even interviewed Dick Wilson, who was Mr. Whipple, the slightly twisted grocer in love with Charmin toilet paper. He was fun, cracking toilet paper jokes.
The easiest two hours of my five years on air was with wrestling superstar Bob Backlund. For the life of me I cannot recall how Backlund decided to come on my show. I had interviewed him once at a local match and I thought he was going to slug me when I asked him how did he respond to people who claimed wrestling was fake.
But somehow, Backlund called me and wanted to come on my show on Aug. 14, 1984, ten days after his last match with the WWF and less than a year after he lost his championship title. I wish I had a tape of that show, as Backlund was highly critical of Vince McMahon, the owner of the WWF.
The phones simply didn’t stop ringing for the two hours.
The next day, I received one of the oddest phone calls in my career. Vince McMahon called me completely unexpectedly and said he had heard I had interviewed Backlund and wanted to know if I was interested in writing for his new wrestling magazine.
I was gob smacked and mumbled some ambiguous reply. I was startled by the call – how did he know in the pre-Internet days of the 1980s that I had spoken with Backlund? How did he know I was a writer?
I never followed up on it. Perhaps I should have.
Other great moments were interviews with the first lady of American cinema Lillian Gish and my personal hero Vincent Price. Gish had recently re-issued her autobiography and her publisher wasn’t cooperative. Undaunted, I contacted her agent and Gish agreed to an interview. She was very sharp and it was a pleasure speaking with her.
Gish liked her interview with me. I liked the unicorn stationary.
Price was appearing at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst with a one-man show titled “The Villain Stills Pursues Me.” My wife and I had front row seats for what was a fantastic evening. The next day Price conducted a press conference and a fellow writer and I attended it. We asked most of the questions and Price walked out of the building with us, continuing his remarks.
With some of these interviews I was able to take some of the conversation and turn it into a written piece that I sold to various publications. My best sale at this time was USA Today, which bought an interview I did with attorney and author Alan Dershowitz who spoke to me about his book “The Best Defense.”
I always advise people to only sell first publications rights and try, if they can, to structure an interview so it can have multiple uses or sales.
My next group of interviews revolved around Animato! The Animation Fan’s magazine, which I co-owned and edited from 1992 to 1997. Many of those interviews were collected in my book “Escape! How Animation Went Mainstream in the 1990s.”
As the managing editor of a group of weekly newspapers, I use interviews with celebrities as a way to change readers’ conceptions about what a community newspaper should cover. People have said to me they didn’t expect to see an interview with Leonard Nimoy or Dave Attell or any number of other people in a “small” weekly.
That’s the power of getting a good interview.
© 2012 by Gordon Michael Dobbs
1 comment:
Its POLO Shirts For Men textile fiber thin is long, is in the wool sheep the highest quality variety. Other like New Zealand, South America, the various European countries Polo for women polo, the Southern Alps arteries and so on have raising, and enjoys the high reputation in the world. The snow blue wool is also POLO L-Sleeved Shirt For Men the common variety. Snow blue Mao Yuan said that the snow especially blue wool POLO T-Shirts For Men, because of produces acquires fame in the British Scotland's snow especially blue archipelago.
Because the snow blue wool and mixes with many shags take the down as the main body and in an opposite direction the wool polo shirt, this kind natural thick thin promiscuous, has formed snow blue woolen fabric unique plentiful and the fluffiness POLO Sweaters For Men, soft, but is not exquisite, the gloss and the elastic good characteristic jeu76ch, have the rough style long sleeve for women.
Post a Comment